Are offices getting bigger or smaller, and why?
So why is all this taking place?
Why do some footprints grow while others shrink? It comes down to how organisations answer four linked questions: how many people need to be in at the same time, what work they come in to do, what quality of space they need to do it, and how sustainability targets constrain or enable choices. Our own research investigates this in a little more detail. We’ve identified four key drivers:
- Employees still associate the office with productivity and creativity, but they want spaces that feel personal and quiet. Forty five percent say they are more productive in the office than at home, yet only about two thirds feel their workplace really supports wellbeing, and fewer than a quarter call their environment extremely successful for productivity or creativity. Asked what would bring them in more often, almost half chose access to quiet zones and set desks with proper kit.
- Facilities leaders say they will act. Seventy six percent expect to create more interactive environments in the next three years. About half expect to downsize, most often to support open, hybrid friendly designs and to align with sustainability goals. Rightsizing and redesigning usually go together.
- Sustainability is shaping size as well as specification. Nearly three in five respondents say it is already a high or top priority, and almost all organisations report at least one green initiative. Yet employees define a truly sustainable office in more structural terms, like renewable energy and real waste reduction, not only recycling bins and a few plants. This pushes owners and occupiers toward better performing buildings and away from older stock, which can mean less space overall, but of a higher quality, with lower energy use per person.
- Another lever is circularity. Our survey finds the vast majority of facilities managers would consider refurbished furniture, and many already run circular strategies for office equipment. That matters for scale decisions because it makes reconfiguration cheaper and faster. If you can refit a floor with renewed furniture and redeploy stored items, you can test new ratios without committing to permanent buildouts.
Does this mean big HQs are a thing of the past?
Not a chance. None of this means the era of the big HQ is over. If you do that work, you will likely end up with less space than before, but it will be more valuable per square foot. In markets where teams are back more often, or where the talent and brand case for a buzzing central hub is strong, you may take more space, but you will spend more of that budget on quality and adaptability than on raw area.
That is what rightsizing really means. Bigger or smaller is the wrong first question. Better is the right one.
Want to read more about how office spaces are evolving? Download our research piece: “Is it time to kill the open office?” today.
Related stories
Around half of all Facilities Managers plan to downsize their office space in the next three years. How, and why?
Join Crown Workspace UK Ltd on Tuesday 21st October, during Circular Economy Week, at our Renew Centre for an interactive tour and discussion on how circular workplace design can create positive community impact.
And a lack of air conditioning is just the beginning This month’s article in the FT opened with a blunt reminder that Lee Kuan Yew credited Singapore’s economic lift-off to two things: multi-ethnic harmony and air-conditioning. Sixty-six years later, the same lesson applies to every mid-size firm on a warming planet. When London racks up […]